O amor e o ódio

Comments

1. Fernando says:

   09/04/2013 at 12:45

   A luta de classes é claríssima, e por enquanto, a classe cleptocrata tem sido vencedora…
   E tem sido vencedora muito por culpa da noção de que já não havia classes, estão a ver, há não muito tempo uma empregada domestica, com os seus pouco mais 400€, era da mesma classe que o Ricardo Salgado, houve até quem defendesse que isto era uma verdade empiricamente comprovada!!
2. Fernando Van-Dúnem says:

   09/04/2013 at 13:13

   Que Bobby Sands a receba como mereçe!
3. rms says:

   09/04/2013 at 16:45

   O legado de Thatcher:

   Poverty went up under Thatcher, according to these figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies. In 1979, 13.4% of the population lived below 60% of median incomes before housing costs. By 1990, it had gone up to 22.2%, or 12.2m people, with huge rises in the mid-1980s.

   With it came a huge rise in inequality. This shows the gini coefficient, which is the most common method of measuring inequality. Under gini, a score of one would be a completely unequal society; zero would be completely equal. Britain’s gini score went up from 0.253 to 0.339 by the time Thatcher resigned.

   She may have been our first prime minister but men still ended her decade paid a lot more than women – especially if you look at the bald figures below.

   As Britain learnt to come to terms with the idea of “no such thing as society”, unemployment shot up under the Conservatives to levels not seen since the Great Depression. The figures show how it lags behind the economy – even after the recession was over, many were unemployed.

   Fica a fonte: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/datablog/2013/apr/08/britain-changed-margaret-thatcher-charts?CMP=twt_fd#poverty
4. Nascimento says:

   11/04/2013 at 15:11

   Atão Huguinho, filho agora não ladras????Olha que é o perigoso esquerdista “guardian”, que faz a analise….